Oral Presentation ANZOS-OSSANZ-AOCO Joint Annual Scientific Meeting 2017

Metabolic improvements following treatment with a duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes (#156)

Jessica McMaster 1 2 , Graeme Rich 1 3 , Erin Shanahan 1 3 , Linda Fletcher 1 3 , Graeme Macdonald 1 3 , Natasha Koloski 1 3 , Mark Morrison 4 , Veronique Chachay 2 3 , Gerald Holtmann 1 3
  1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  3. Southside Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  4. University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Background:

Bariatric surgery is the most effective obesity treatment, however, less invasive options have recently been developed. The endoscopically placed duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve (DJBS) (Endobarrier®) has been demonstrated to facilitate weight loss, but little is known about its impact on metabolic parameters.

Aim:

To assess the impact of the DJBS on metabolic outcomes in 15 patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Methods:

The DJBS was implanted and remained in situ for up to 48 weeks. Subjects (M:F, 4:11) received medical and dietetic follow-up throughout. Liver biochemistry was monitored monthly. Hepatic fibrosis and intrahepatic fat (indicated by the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP)) were assessed by hepatic transient elastography at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Glycaemic control and lipid profile were monitored every 4 months. Blood pressure was assessed at clinical reviews.

Results:

Body weight (123.8 ± 17.5 kg vs. 103.2 ± 16.8 kg; (p<0.0001)) and waist, hip and neck circumference (p<0.001; n=11) were significantly reduced. Liver function tests significantly improved (median alanine transaminase baseline: 34 U/L (29-49) vs. 19 U/L (16-23)); median aspartate transaminase baseline: 25 U/L (18 – 33) vs. 16 U/L (14 – 18); (p<0.0001)). Hepatic fibrosis was significantly reduced (11.0 ± 7.6 kPa vs. 6.2 ± 1.8 kPa (p<0.05)), likely due to a significant reduction in intrahepatic fat as indicated by a reduction in the CAP (347 ± 41 vs. 302 ± 47 decibels/m; p<0.001). In parallel, significant improvements in mean glycated haemoglobin and fasting glucose (p<0.05) and total cholesterol, triglycerides and very low density lipoprotein (p<0.01) were observed. There was no significant change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol or systolic or diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusion:

DJBS implantation resulted in significant improvements in hepatic and other metabolic indices over the intervention period. Long-term data is being collected in relation to metabolic parameters post-explant.